Taylor Sheridan’s latest project, Landman, a series centered on the modern oil industry in Texas, has sparked strong reactions among streaming audiences. Despite widespread criticism online, it continues to hold an impressive #2 position on the streaming charts.
Viewers describe the show as both gripping and difficult to watch, with many tuning in out of frustration rather than admiration. Critics have labeled this as “hate-watching,” a trend where audiences continue watching shows they dislike simply to stay part of the conversation.
“People are watching it just to complain about it,” one review noted, highlighting the divisive nature of Sheridan’s storytelling style.
Sheridan, known for Yellowstone and Mayor of Kingstown, once again explores themes of power, wealth, and morality in the American frontier. However, some viewers argue that Landman leans too heavily on familiar tropes—gritty masculinity, political undertones, and oil-fueled conflict—resulting in fatigue rather than fascination.
Others defend the show’s authenticity and raw depiction of modern Texas, praising its performances and production quality despite uneven pacing.
Analysts point out that controversy has bolstered the show’s visibility. The mix of star power, bold narrative choices, and the Sheridan name ensures constant social media discussion and steady viewership.
“It’s the kind of show people love to argue about,” wrote one industry commentator. “That tension keeps it trending week after week.”
While Landman splits its audience between admiration and irritation, its polarizing nature proves to be Sheridan’s double-edged formula for attention.
Author’s Summary: Taylor Sheridan’s Landman draws strong criticism but maintains top streaming rankings, turning viewer dissatisfaction into sustained engagement.