Royals acted swiftly to banish wayward Andrew — but is there more to come?

Royals Act Swiftly to Distance Themselves from Andrew

How many headlines can one man generate? That is exactly what Andrew has become — a constant source of media attention. For an institution usually moving at a glacier's pace, the British royal family has acted with remarkable speed in recent days.

Historically known for slow decision-making, the royal family’s response to Andrew’s situation has been unexpectedly ruthless, rivaling even the Mafia. King Charles’s decisive action came through a terse 109-word statement. It was cold, blunt, and highly effective, quickly stripping Andrew of the privileges he had taken for granted throughout his life.

The statement’s announcement on a major BBC current affairs program received enthusiastic applause from the studio audience, highlighting the public significance of the move.

What More Could the Royals Know?

Biographer Andrew Lownie has hinted in interviews that further revelations about the king’s brother may emerge. These may involve allegations concerning women, Andrew’s numerous taxpayer-funded overseas trips while serving as a UK trade envoy, and financial matters.

“In 2001, Charles had urged against giving Andrew that role because he believed his wayward brother would use it to ‘line his pockets’ and just ‘chase women and play golf’,”

— Andrew Lownie, biographer

At the time, then-Prime Minister Tony Blair overruled King Charles’s concerns and appointed Andrew to the role despite these warnings.

Summary

The British royals' swift and severe distancing from Andrew signals deeper issues yet to come, suggesting the full scope of the problem remains hidden.

more

Irish Examiner Irish Examiner — 2025-11-03

More News